100% or 47% - which percentage would you want to be??

One candidate is for all the people.  Health care for all, affordable college education, a liveable wage for all to live, a working class and not a working poor....  wants to represent 100% of the people...equal pay and equal rights for women ....   good primary education for all children...  a working class that will again be the back bone of the country...


One candidate wants to represent approximately 53% of the people; the other 47% will get caught in some sort of net;  of those fortunate 53% the top 1% will get all the attention.... Tax breaks for the rich  and no breaks for the poor... Women as 2nd class citizens with not rights...  and he says he represents all the people...  That's right all the people he wants to represent...

I always thought the 100% was way better then 47%.....

Man of HIS people

If Mitt wins I hope you are not part of the 47% of the throw away people - but afterall he is a man of the people.....The Super Rich People that is....

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/29/opinion/krugman-medicaid-on-the-ballot.html?ref=opinion